Archive for May, 2007

Republicans are Feeding Fascism

I’m reading a book by Thom Hartmann called “Screwed: The Undeclared War Against the Middle Class.” The idea it presents is that the neoconservative powers are being paid by corporations to control the will of the American people so that the rich get richer and the poor get poorer. This will create an elite ruling class and drive wages down so Americans will work for next to nothing while the corporations reel in the dough. In short, they are all fascists.

They direct blame onto ethnic groups such as illegals (Mexicans), and terrorists (any brown person from the middle east). This causes discrimination and prejudice that keeps American attention elsewhere. Radio show hosts with bad attitudes hide behind freedom of speech and lie to the public about the real reason the economy is crap, their life-saving prescriptions are not covered by their insurance, their children can’t afford to go to college and many other core issues that effect each American personally. Continually spouting a call to “traditional American values,” they distract the people from the fact that the single most important American value, the freedom from tyrannical rule fueled by an elite class of large business owners, is being ripped out of the constitution. Perpetual war in the name of patriotism is keeping America blind to what is happening in the White House.

I already knew all this before I started reading the book, though. What I didn’t know is that the plan to rule America through corporations goes all the way back to Hitler’s days. The Bush family has modeled their rise in power on that of Hitler himself. In chapter 7, a section titled, “Hiding Behind the Flag” on page 109, Hartmann describes Hitler’s use of patriotism and industry to rise to power. The process is nearly identical to Bush’s own. Both created fear in the minds of the people, saying that only one way works to combat any threat to people’s liberty. Both have invited corporations to fund the government. Both have removed checks and balances that were put in place so that one man cannot have too much power, all for fear of another attack. Both have set up a “single new national agency to protect the security of the Homeland, consolidating the actions of dozens of previously independent police, border, and investigative agencies under a single powerful leader” (109).

On page 120 Hartmann quotes FDR’s vice president Henry Wallace to show how American fascists of that time are carbon copies of the conservatives today. Wallace says, “The American fascists are most easily recognized by their deliberate pervasion of truth and fact.” Limbaugh and Micheal Savage come to mind. Wallace is quoted, “The American fascist would prefer not to use violence. His method is to poison the channels of public information.” No one is beating the American people into submission of tyrannical dictatorship. Instead, the American people are being duped into believing it is the best way to live free.

Seeing as how Rush is one of the most popular hosts on talk radio and roughly half of the country votes republican, it seems this method is working wonderfully. People that vote Republican don’t know they are feeding into fascism. They have been convinced that they are merely fighting for free market, family values, and the safety of the American people. If only it were that simple.

Hartmann closes the chapter by saying thus, “Today we again stand at the same crossroad Roosevelt and Wallace confronted during the Great Depression and World War II. Fascism is again rising in America, this time calling itself “compassionate conservatism” (121). These neocons are controlling the airwaves and buying our government while the American middle class continues to shrink. The people that have fallen out of the middle class are blamed for their own situation as the poor are blamed for being poor. Immigrants are supposedly taking our jobs (yes, so many Americans out of high school want to work in fields for twelve hours a day). The threat of terrorism has given our president unlimited military power to do with as he pleases. He doesn’t even need to fight terrorism anymore, he just uses patriotism and false sources of ‘evidence’ as sound reason to invade other countries. Like, maybe Poland-oh, I mean Iraq. (I’m really getting Bush confused with someone else now. Lines are getting blurry, I apologize). Same problems, different era.

If you are Republican and you are reading this, please, please open your eyes. Your needs are not important to the people you are putting in power. Your money is. Think of this, conservative media is still blaming the state of the country on liberals and progressives, and yet Republicans had controlled the House for twelve years and we have had a Republican Executive for seven. Isn’t that enough time to improve the condition of the country? Don’t let the American dream die. Go pick up Hartmann’s book and read for yourself.

Two Good Things I’ve Learned Today

First, the book I wrote for Advanced Composition won an A. My professor told me it was a very powerful paper. I worked damn hard on it, so I’m very proud.

Second, Barack Obama is a Leo! Now there really is no reason not to vote for him! Ok, seriously though, he is on the ball, intelligent, eloquent, and purposeful (all qualities Mr. Brush-er-Bush doesn’t possess).

Those are two good things I have learned today. I am content.

Worst President Ever…

And our Congress just rolled over and got on their knees beneath him like two-dollar hookers because he vetoed their last bill. It scared them enough to drop the issue of withdrawal from Iraq until a later date. What a bunch of pussies. Maybe they weren’t listening when we put them in power in November. America has been calling for change and it is not happening.

I understand that our military needs money. I’m all for supporting our troops. However, I do not agree that the war effort should be supported indefinitely. Especially when the effort is futile. Bush’s plan to convert everyone in Iraq to Christianity and democracy while syphoning oil out of the back door is a huge failure and it is time we got out of there. So Congress passed a bill with a timeline for withdrawal and President Brat vetoed it.

A bill has to be passed, period. Our military needs food, shelter, weapons, mail, etc and so forth. I know Bush is stupid, but I don’t think he would have shot down two bills in a row. No one wants our military to suffer while our President throws a fit. This is why I believe the new bill presented by Congress should include another timeline. That’s just my opinion.

Maybe the Dems know what they are doing. Maybe they think positive reinforcement will work on our child-like, war-monger President. Give him what he wants now and he will be forced to reciprocate when Congress brings up the issue of withdrawal again in July. I doubt it though. Selfish children don’t play fair. I guess we’ll have to wait and see, which is sad for our brothers and sisters in Iraq who might not get to see July. We the people spoke in November. We have yet to be heard, even by the people we put in power to act as our voice.

Global Warming: The Planet in Peril

I leave for school today with my twenty-eight page manuscript to turn into English class. My English teacher assigned the class to write a book about a controversial topic of choice. I chose global warming. At first I was discouraged, because the four books with the opposite viewpoint of mine kept showing how scientists had predicted things in the past that don’t hold true today due to lack of technology in the past. There was even a whole chapter in one book regarding the Hockey Stick controversy that had supposedly proven that during the Renaissance earth’s temperatures were much higher than the level they have risen over the last hundred years.

I couldn’t let it be at that. I turned on the news and saw parts of Greenland surfacing from ice that had covered it for thousands of years. I saw miles of coral reef bleaching in the sun. I saw areas once covered with ice suddenly blooming with wildflowers. And this was all before I saw An Inconvenient Truth. I knew something just wasn’t right. How could these scientists deny what was going on around them?

I found out that the author of one of the books I read was being paid by Exxon Mobil (Patrick J. Michaels). I found out that the author of an article included in the book was also on Mobil’s payroll (Robert C. Balling). Funny, the two probably met at the bank. That was quite a discovery. I would have to include that in my argumentative paper. After all, our teaches stressed the importance of considering our sources. I couldn’t find one scientist that agreed with Kyoto that was being paid by oil companies.

The main argument of another writer, Thomas Gale Moore, was that global warming was a good thing. We would all be much happier if December was 75 degrees. After all, mankind flourished 6,000 years ago, and boy was it hot!

Alas, the planet is beginning to speak for herself. Conservatives can no longer pretend that the evidence has been faked, such as they try to do with evolution and the round-world idea. Scientists can pocket their oil money as much as they want and die happy, rich deaths before the rest of us are left to clean up the mess, but it won’t change the facts. They can argue “not enough evidence has been gathered” until they are blue in the face, but advocates of the earth have met their burden of proof and all these skeptics have to go on are a couple of rogue scientists fighting for the future of Exxon. Like the hole in the O-zone they tried to deny for years, there was not enough evidence at one time in the past to prove climate change. Technology has come a long way and has proven both the O-zone crisis and global warming to be real. Read it and weep, guys. Even a community college student can show these skeptic-tologists to be wrong.

Sources:

Michaels, Patrick J., ed. Shattered Consensus: The True State of Global Warming. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2005.

Moore, Thomas Gale. Climate of Fear: Why we Shouldn’t Worry about Global Warming. Washington DC: Cato Insititute, 1998.

Cooper, Mary H. “Global Warming.” Congressional Quarterly. CQ Researcher. Folsom Lake College, EDC library. 29 Jan. 2007. <http//www.cqresearcher.com>

Plus, there are many websites that report scientists (I use the term loosely) who are being paid by Exxon. Enjoy your Techron, guys.

How to Bash a Neocon (Whenever You Want)

I was just wondering how easy it might be to make Ann Coulter look like an idiot. I, a college student, might not have a chance against someone who was named “one of the top 100 public intellectuals by federal judge Richard Posner in 2001” (fire that guy) as it mentions in her “About the Author,” but I’ve read a couple of her articles on her website (which is the only place she has a job now, I believe) so I knew what I was up against. Not surprisingly, it was fairly simple: she does it to herself. I only had to purchase her throwaway book from a yard sale for three bucks, titled “How to talk to a Liberal (If you Must)” published in 2004, and use common sense to see just how ignorant she really is.

All the inconsistencies, all the twists of the truth, all the sources that remain a mystery, the examples of what unnamed people are saying, just in her introduction are far too extensive to list on my humble little blog. I will, however, present here a few of her inane remarks:

Freedom of Speech: “There is probably no conservative student newspaper in the country that has not been trashed or burned by liberal” (2).

How dare liberals burn Dartmouth student newspapers in protest! My god! First amendment! All the conservative student press wanted to do is make light of date rape, racism, and poke fun at Native Americans! After all that hard work, I’m sure these righteous young minds are up for a get together, probably keeping themselves warm over a bonfire of Harry Potter books, like any good Christian.

On Torture: “Torturing the guy you know for a fact is withholding information actually works quite well” (7).

Of course! No one admits to a crime they haven’t really committed! We can be sure the people we torture are guilty! Look how many inmates have been put on death row with the solid evidence of a signed confession obtained after hours of interrogation! They weren’t even being physically harmed when they started talking! Let’s just never mind how many confessors have been exonerated through DNA evidence.

Page 8: “Al Gore couldn’t say ‘pass the salt’ without claiming to have invented salt.”

That Al Gore. I’m sure this is in reference to a quote of him saying, “I invented the internet.” Wait, where is that quote? I can’t seem to find it anywhere! Could it be that this is the actual quote, as I found on CNN.com? “During my service in the United States Congress, I took the initiative in creating the Internet.” This website makes an excellent point about why Al Gore wasn’t that far off.

Page 10: [Regarding her first rule for talking to a liberal] “Come to think of it, since our side does not accept Klansmen [Senator Bryd], murderers [Ted Kennedy], or rapists [William Jefferson Clinton], this rule may be simplified to: Don’t be defensive.”

That’s right! Because when the Democrats made it clear in 1964 that racism and discrimination were not part of the core values held by that party, a certain segregationist Mr. Strom Thurmond, then a Democrat (Dixiecrat, really), had no where to go but the party that would accept such a man: The Republicans.

As far as rape and murder, good thing justice was served. ­–Oh, what was that you said Voice of Reason? What do you mean not convicted? What do you mean not even charged? Are there any politicians that have been convicted or charged with sex crimes? Maybe these ones?

The ‘F’ Word: “On the bright side, you know you’ve arrived when liberals start calling you a fag. Curiously, these proponents of tolerance always choose ‘gay’ as their most searing epithet” (15).

Do I need to go here? I can’t even sarcastically address this one! Really, Google “Ann Coulter calls (Take a pick: Clinton, Gore, or Edwards) a fag” and you get all kinds of websites! Including YouTube, where you can hear her say the very word! What a nut! How many liberals did she name that use the word fag? Nought! Because she’s got monopoly on it!

The best part is, she thinks she can say “It was a joke” and everything is ok. We’ll forgive her without an apology because she was only poking fun. And now for a personal antidote just to prove a point: When I reached the ripe age of seven, I realized I could hurt my little sister’s feelings calling her names and get away with it by shouting, “Just kidding! I was only joking with you!” Fortunately, my parents are smarter than Coulter’s (who should have left her at the hospital in whatever year she says she was born-it changes all the time). They realized quickly my scheme and put a stop to it right away.

Ok, one more and then I’m done.

How to Beat up on a Republican: Page 11 and 12 the right-wingnut tells her minions never to compliment a Democrat because “compliments to Democrats are always returned with insults.” She then describes an epidode of “Larry King Live” from May 7, 2004. As evidence of Democrats returning insults to the compliments of conservatives, she uses the first statement of each senator featured on the show.

Senator John Warner (Republican of Virginia): “First, If I may say of my colleagues on the committee, and twenty-four senators out of twenty-five were present at that hearing, I think we comported ourselves individually and collectively as best I’ve seen it in the Senate….”

Senator Jon Kyl (Republican of Arizona): “I agree with Senator Warner that the senators comported themselves well for the most part….”

Senator Tom Harkin (Democrat of Iowa): “Well, [Rumsfeld should resign] for a couple of reasons.”

Sure sounds to me like Democrat beating up on Republicans that was just trying to give out kudos for the great job that was done! As soon as the Republican senators give out compliments, that Harkin belligerently tries to dispute them!

In reality, the second and third quotes are much further in the transcript than the first. Harkin is not replying to Kyl and Warner’s compliments of a job well-done. He is answering a question posed by the host of the show, Larry King.

King: “Senator Harkin, why do you think he should resign?”

Sen. Harking: “Well, for a couple of reasons”.

Now, correct me if I’m wrong, but isn’t the whole point of a talk show to feature two different opinions?

Her next example of Democrats beating up on Republicans is a transcript from “Meet the Press” that I found dated on May 9, 2004

A few days later, Republican senator Lindsey Graham used about half his allotted time on Meet the Press to make clear he had absolutely no criticisms of the Democrats: “I didn’t come here to beat on Senator Kerry or to defend any political position. This is not about Republican and Democratic politics….[Let’s] show the world that Republicans and Democrats may disagree on policy and the war in Iraq, but we have the ability to make sure those accountable are going to be held accountable….Republicans and Democrats need to come together to prove to the world that our system works.”

The Democrats on the panel returned the love by accusing President Bush of responsibility for Abu Ghraib prison abuse (Senator Carl Levin: “I think he helped to create the atmosphere,” saying the mission in Iraq would probably fail (General Wesley Clark: “I think there is a greater than 50/50 chance, let’s say 2:1 chance, of a catastrophic early end to this mission”).

I found the transcript on NBC.com. They ask that any use of their material be cited as NBCNews’ Meet the Press©2004. They are so nice. Random House (the shrew’s publisher) will probably take me away in the middle of the night for all the material I’m using against- I mean from- Coulter, even if I do cite it.

First of all, Levin does not say, “I think he helped to create the atmosphere” in response to Graham’s statement. Graham’s statement comes much later in the transcript. In fact, Levin is responding to the host, who had asked, “You believe the president then is ultimately responsible?” Levin answers, “I think he helped to create the atmosphere by the way in which he called the Geneva Convention discussion relative to Afghanistan a matter of legalism. It’s not legalism. It goes right to the heart of this matter.”

Not only does Coulter include incomplete quotes and position them in such a way as to mislead her faithful readers, but she leaves context out as well. Graham didn’t appear on Meet the Press to talk about uniting parties. The point of the show was to find out who was responsible for the torture that occurred at Abu Ghraib. Again, aren’t talk shows supposed to feature different points of view? Unless you are Fox News, the point of these debates is to show both sides of an issue.

So, after all 18 pages of the introductory chapter, I have one of the longest blogs I’ve ever written, and I even left a lot of her screw-ups out. You should really read the one about liberals “getting drunk and having unprotected public sex with Colin Farrell” (page 11, regarding her feelings toward public apologies). If you can find a free copy, pick it up and see for yourself. However, don’t spend any money on it because I can honestly say I want my three dollars back.

 

Now for the boring stuff:

Sources:

CNN Larry King Live. “Analysis of Donald Rumsfeld’s Congressional Testimony.” CNN.com © 2005 Cable News Network LP, LLLP. A Time Warner Company. All Rights Reserved.

Coulter, Ann. How to Talk to a Liberal (If You Must): the world according to Ann Coulter. New York: Crown Forum, 2004.

NBC News’ Meet the Press Copyright © 2004, National Broadcasting Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Discourse Concluded, With a Note on Republicans

As it goes, through the course of argument and debate, one may learn more about themselves as well as about others. I learned that there are some arguments that will never be settled, but that even with opposing viewpoints one may find common ground. I will never agree with the author of “My Errant Mind” regarding gun control, rape victims or the treatment of suspected criminals before being proven guilty, but I do agree that there is a huge rift in our country that needs to be closed.

I also agree that America needs an administration that is going to take care of Americans. Health care, labor, the economy, etc. I don’t know how he feels about the proposed solutions that Democrats offer for turning this nation around, but I’m pretty sure he can agree the Republicans are doing a pretty poor job. He said that he wouldn’t vote for Republican or Democrat, which is okay with me. As long as it’s not Republican.

Another word on Republicans. What’s all this talk about the glory days of the Regan administration? The man had excellent PR people that made him look great, but the man did nothing but give free rein to corporations, spend our social security, and destroy health care. He destroyed political discourse in the media by letting networks with agendas amass power (Fox News anyone?) And regardless of what any Young Republicans of America member will tell you, he DID NOT end Communism. The Red was already on its way out. “Tear down this wall!” Yeah, the people in Berlin were already tearing it down when he got there.

Now that these idiots with a ‘thing’ for changing the past to suit them have been in power for awhile and destroyed our economy, our relations with other nations, and our reputation, it is time for Americans to take back this country. It’s happening. Watch out, neocons, true Americans are on their way. We aren’t going to beat you with a Bible or throw money at you to influence you. That may be how you get things done, but real Americans do far better: We vote! We protest and make our grievances heard. We choose to spend our money in corporations that provide jobs for Americans, not India and China. We will take your Congress! Oh, we already did!

Regan was in power for eight years. This was the Republican Golden Age. Prior to that, from FDR (best president ever) on was a Golden Age for democracy. The middle class was stronger than it had ever been. People could afford to own their own homes straight out of college. Women could stay at home if they wanted. (Funny, conservatives insist women stay at home but don’t support economics that make it available for a household to run on one income). Americans could afford college out of high school. As a nation, we made major strides in ending injustice and discrimination (thought the job is far from done). These were all direct results of the New Deal and the principles put in place by the Progressives.

40 years and so much progress? Or eight years of media hype coupled with huge debt, trickle-down economics, and a growing social security crisis?

Take your pick.

It’s time for a new Golden Era.

Vote Democrat!

Not Alone in the Fight

This is an update of the discourse with the “My Errant Mind” blogger. The guy isn’t so bad, just misinformed. He seems to be conceding just enough that I’m beginning to believe he’s not a complete gun-toting nut job. I suppose it’s normal for people to hope that might makes right. This man just thinks carrying weapons is the best way to have a free society. And he is wrong, of course.

However open-minded he is, however, he seems a little confused about who’s side he’s on. So many of his views are NeoConservative (such as “liberals are at fault for everything”) but insists he is not conservative at all! Luckily, my sweetheart over at Crispy Quips shed some light on the subject. I’m not going to post the discourse on here. It’s very long. You can go to the site yourself and see how my wonderfully intelligent liberal boyfriend educated us all.

No One Got the Memo?

While browsing the news this morning I came across an article from Forbes.com with recent developments in the Pat Tillman case. Tillman was a soldier in Iraq with a potential NFL career waiting for him at home until he was shot down by his own army. That same army decided that it was best the American people, including his own family, remember this tragedy as a heroic gunfight with the enemy. A bit 1984-ish to me, don’t you say?

The White House is under scrutiny because Bush and his cronies were sent memos that described Tillman’s death as possibly being the result of friendly fire, but no one seemed to have gotten the memos. These people are running our country and they can’t even get notes to each other? I fail to buy into that.

The article reported why Bush couldn’t have known that there was a cover-up:

“In questioning what the White House knew about Tillman, Rep. Elijah Cummings, D-Md., cited a memo written by a top general seven days after Tillman’s death warning it was “highly possible” the Army Ranger was killed by friendly fire and making clear his warning should be conveyed to the president. President Bush made no reference to the way Tillman died in a speech delivered two days after the memo was written.

A White House spokesman has said there’s no indication Bush received the warning in the memo written April 29, 2004, by then-Maj. Gen. Stanley McChrystal to Gen. John Abizaid, head of Central Command”.

The article said of good old Rummy:

“Gimble said that Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld sent him a letter around the time Rumsfeld left office last December saying he hadn’t known Tillman’s death was from friendly fire until around May 20, 2004. Abizaid told Gimble he was traveling in the war theater and didn’t see the memo saying Tillman’s death was possibly friendly fire until after Tillman’s memorial service”.

In the words of my generation, WHAT-EVER!