Posts Tagged ‘writing’

The Fear of Fear

I was looking through some old essays of mine on my thumb drive and I found this one I wrote in English a few semesters ago. I lightly edited a couple sentences for clarity and grammar. I have another one I might post that I wrote in History class that describes J. Edgar’s useless career, but we’ll see. Here’s my A+ paper (ok, I think it was a B+, but who’s counting?):

The Fear of Fear
by Katie Pope

On the morning of September 11th, 2001, many Americans woke up to the first major, successful attack on American soil since December 7th, 1941. Every channel on television broadcast the pictures of the attack over and over again for nearly a week. Americans watched in horror as the Twin Towers, monumental structures built to commemorate capitalism and all it’s perceived glory, were razed in a matter of a few hours by jet-planes flown by Muslim extremist. The loss, fear and anger that citizens felt in the following months tormented the American people who were just looking for answers. The government responded quickly by rounding up 5,000 Muslim and Arabs for detention and deportation hearings and passing laws that made it legal for the detainees to be held without due process of law. One such law passed that even allows for the unwarranted wire-tapping of telephones.

This seemed to be a new era to Americans, but according to Haynes Johnson, in the book Age of Anxiety: McCarthyism to Terrorism, this was not the first time America was overtaken by panic and hysteria. He writes:

During the McCarthy era, the profiling of people perceived as national security threats became commonplace. Then, suspected Communists were profiled-artists, Jewish scientist and intellectuals, and foreigners- and subjected to imprisonment or blacklisting. Today, another type-Muslim males-has been subjected to profiling, resulting in massive detention sweeps eerily similar to the dragnet arrests that grew out of the Great Red Scare hysteria in the aftermath of World War II (467).

Now, as well as then, the government is able to get away with these injustices because the American people believe that they are safer because of the new laws and the treatment of Muslims in America. The Cold War and the age of McCarthyism of the nineteenth century created the same kind of fear in the hearts of Americans that is felt today towards Terrorism.

The history of the Red Scare is one of the darkest times in American history. Legislation was passed that targeted foreign born citizens from nations in Eastern Europe. Immigrants were rounded up and deported. Anyone working for the federal government that sympathized with or followed communist ideals would be fired and would have to stand up to the House Un-American Activities Committee, or HUAC. This committee was supposedly formed for the protection of democracy in the United States, but ended up being a smearing platform that not only ruined the careers of hundreds of federal employees, but also blacklisted artists, actors and writers. The House Un-American Activities Committee was one of the most influential at scaring the American public during this era. Johnson describes:

To its critics [HUAC] was the committee that spent the most money, called the most witnesses, published the most pages, visited more places, ruined more lives, and was responsible or the least legislation of any committee in the United States Congress.(113-14).

Senator Joseph McCarthy, a significant figure during the Red Scare, was responsible for supplying the names of federal employees to the HUAC, even though he didnít really have a list. In the book Citizen Hoover, by Jay Robert Nash, the effect was disheartening: “Because they were fearful of being labeled Communists or Communist sympathizers, few people in Washington, or anywhere else, were willing to stand up to McCarthy” (106). Although there was no real evidence that any crimes had been committed, the HUAC and Senator McCarthy proceeded to ruin the lives of thousands of Americans. Although shocking, the Red Scare is not unique. History is repeating itself in the era of the War on Terrorism.

During the Great War, or World War I as it would later be known, the Sedition Act and the Espionage and Alien Acts were passed. These acts called for fines and jail time to persons found to “utter, print, write, or publish any disloyal, profane, scurrilous, or abusive language about the form of government of the United States of the Constitution of the United States, or the military or naval forces of the United States, or the flag” (As quoted in Johnson 104)

Freedom of speech was silenced. Masses of immigrants with opposing ideals were deported. Although there is a new face on the enemy, the result is the same. The counry is again divided between those who back the governmentís actions (and who are considered patriotic) and the critics that are speaking out against the injustices.

Communism was considered a threat to the American way of life. In its own propaganda, HUAC contrasted the writings of Karl Marx to the teachings of Jesus Christ to justify the paranoia they were creating against communist ideals.

“‘Marx represents the lowest form of materialism, while ‘Christ symbolizes the highest and noblest conceptions of the spiritual’ It was this irreconcilable conflict between the teachings of Christ and Marx; upon which ‘the future of Western civilization is staked’” (Johnson 115)

Of course, the committee’s own chairman, Martin Dies, believed that the idea of racial equality was also a communist evil, even though racism doesn’t coincide with the Christian values of “love thy neighbor.” Materialism was also associated with Marx, yet the supporters of the HUAC were against Franklin Roosevelt’s progressive New Deal that provided government interference in monopolies, provided health and safety regulations for laborers, minimum wage, and resulted in taking the country out of the depression that had struck in the thirties. Christianity is once again the cornerstone in the fight against “evil.” Islam is being portrayed as a bloody, oppressive religion with no place in America, even though the terrorists are a small group of extremists that do not represent the true followers of the faith.

In this present era, the Patriot Act and the treatment of Muslim Americans are very familiar to the actions of HUAC and the Sedition Act. In a post-9-11 world, Americans are again stocking gas masks and bomb shelters as they did when America and Russia’s conflicting ideals and stocks of weapons created a breeding ground for paranoia and panic. Johnson writes:

An American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) report tells what happened next: ‘Unannounced, the FBI descended upon thousands of Arabs, Muslims, and South Asians at their workplaces, homes, universities, and mosques. Although called “voluntary,” the interviews were inherently coercive and few felt free to refuse. The FBI agents, sometimes accompanied by immigration officials, asked questions about sensitive activities protected by the First Amendment such as religious practice, mosque attendance and feelings toward the United States’(465)

The terror felt by foreign born immigrants was similar to the terror felt in the 1930′s through the 1950′s when the Red Scare was at its height. However, Johnson argues that the horrors experienced in today’s era were even worse than the McCarthy era. He writes about the prison abuses of Afghanistan and Guantanamo Bay being close to torture. These abuses were similar to the abuses of suspected foreign spies in the Red Scare, but the most striking similarity was “how much they reflected the mind-set of the McCarthy era” (Johnson 472). The country is again in a state of paranoia.

Americans are once again faced with the dilemma of the McCarthy Red Scare era. Anyone opposing the treatment of immigrants or the passing of unconstitutional laws under the guise of safety from terrorism will be considered un-patriotic. How far will our government go this time? Already, unwarranted wire-tapping has been made legal. That means that the government can go into anyone’s home without the burden of proof and spy on personal phone calls. The Military Commissions Act of 2006 allows for detainment of anyone “purposefully or materially supporting hostilities against the United States” without legal representation.

American Citizens, foreign-born or otherwise, can be taken to secret locations just by being targeted as a suspect and held indefinitely. These same fears ran through the minds of citizens in America during the Red Scare as neighbors turned on each other to report “Communist Activities.” The parallels of the Cold War era and the War on Terrorism are frightening and alarming. The biggest motivation and destructive force of these two eras was none other than the fear of fear.

What a Week!

If you want a good laugh, see this blog here on ThinkProgress.org

If you are still bored, go see Crispy Quips.

Fine journalism here.

In other news, the man suspected of killing a seventeen year old girl in the back of his SUV was questioned five months ago for a similar shooting. In the previous incident, the girl lived but is permanently blind. She says she remembers nothing leading up to the shooting. The man, Raul Reyes, was never charged. According to the Mountain Democrat, he offers no explanation as to how either victim ended up in his car.

The plot thickens.

I was surprised that this was the fourth story in the Wednesday Mountain Democrat that had to do with murder. It seems that the small town image of El Dorado County is quickly changing into one dotted with murder and crime. Could this be the end of small foothill life in this area? Only time will tell.

Out of the Mouths of Lames

“Even Falwell’s fans, such as evangelist Billy Graham and former President Bush, kept throwing in the ‘We didn’t always agree’ disclaimer… And when I die, if you didn’t always agree with me, would you mind keeping it to yourself?” -Ann Coulter, Jerry Fallwell – Say Hello to Ronald Reagan, May 16, 2007.


Coulter was criticizing public figures for adding, “Although I didn’t agree with everything Fallwell had to say…” to their statements about the bigot’s life when she so arrogantly asked that the same statement be left out of any comments about her life when she died. As if she is that important! I picture more of a relieved sigh from both political camps when she finally kicks the bucket. To Republicans she is a liability and to everyone else she is just a manly-looking shrew. The best thing anyone could say about the end of her life is, “FINALLY!”

In other news, Obama is the man with the plan. If you haven’t heard, he plans to reform health care in this country and finally create universal health care to the millions of Americans (including nine million children) that are not covered. He also plans to encourage preventive medicine and update technology. You can read more about his plan at this website, http://my.barackobama.com/page/content/hcplan. Also see Crispy Quips on my blogroll. He did a bit more research on the subject than I did.

Closer and closer come the Primaries. I pray and pray (to pagan gods according to Republicans) that Hillary falls. We don’t need her disunity and ego dividing this country more. She is the Democratic equivalent of Bush- ego driven, set in her ways, and short-sighted. Down with Hillary! Barack ’08!

Another note on Barack. My mother, a Democrat for many years, (although lately she is beginning to scare me with leaving Laura Schlessinger books around the house claiming they are “funny.”) told me that Obama is too close to Islam. As the Conservative media machine (that still insists it is oppressed by the liberal media that consists of Air America and PBS) repeats Obama’s middle name so that the idea that he is islamic will seep into the minds of unsuspecting Americans. Coulter even calls him “B. Hussein Obama” just for impact. As if that name automatically qualifies you as a middle-eastern dictator. If that is the case, there must be a butt-load of dictators, seeing as how Hussein has been one of the most popular names in the area for many years, before and after Saddam.

Now, pick up The Audacity of Hope and flip to the chapter titled, “Faith.” Read about Obama’s upbringing, the household he grew up in, and his own personal journey to root himself further into the Christian faith. You will find no Islamic religious upbringing whatsoever. His middle name was given to him by his father, a former muslim turned atheist, who did not live in the same household and therefore could not have given Obama an Islamic upbringing. Still, consrevatives can say the word “Hussein” and strike fear into ignorant Americans looking for safety from an attack by the Iraqi people (the ones that had nothing to do with 9/11, remember?). Points to the Republicans again, for being the masters of spin.

That is all the ramblings I have for today. Before I forget, the sources for this blog entry are as follows:

Coulter, Ann. “Jerry Fallwell- Say Hello to Ronald Reagan.” anncoulter.com. 16 May 2007. 2 Jun 2007 <http://www.anncoulter.com/cgi-local/article.cgi?article=183>.

Obama, Barack. The Audacity of Hope. 1st. New York: Crown Publishing, 2006.

Global Warming: The Planet in Peril

I leave for school today with my twenty-eight page manuscript to turn into English class. My English teacher assigned the class to write a book about a controversial topic of choice. I chose global warming. At first I was discouraged, because the four books with the opposite viewpoint of mine kept showing how scientists had predicted things in the past that don’t hold true today due to lack of technology in the past. There was even a whole chapter in one book regarding the Hockey Stick controversy that had supposedly proven that during the Renaissance earth’s temperatures were much higher than the level they have risen over the last hundred years.

I couldn’t let it be at that. I turned on the news and saw parts of Greenland surfacing from ice that had covered it for thousands of years. I saw miles of coral reef bleaching in the sun. I saw areas once covered with ice suddenly blooming with wildflowers. And this was all before I saw An Inconvenient Truth. I knew something just wasn’t right. How could these scientists deny what was going on around them?

I found out that the author of one of the books I read was being paid by Exxon Mobil (Patrick J. Michaels). I found out that the author of an article included in the book was also on Mobil’s payroll (Robert C. Balling). Funny, the two probably met at the bank. That was quite a discovery. I would have to include that in my argumentative paper. After all, our teaches stressed the importance of considering our sources. I couldn’t find one scientist that agreed with Kyoto that was being paid by oil companies.

The main argument of another writer, Thomas Gale Moore, was that global warming was a good thing. We would all be much happier if December was 75 degrees. After all, mankind flourished 6,000 years ago, and boy was it hot!

Alas, the planet is beginning to speak for herself. Conservatives can no longer pretend that the evidence has been faked, such as they try to do with evolution and the round-world idea. Scientists can pocket their oil money as much as they want and die happy, rich deaths before the rest of us are left to clean up the mess, but it won’t change the facts. They can argue “not enough evidence has been gathered” until they are blue in the face, but advocates of the earth have met their burden of proof and all these skeptics have to go on are a couple of rogue scientists fighting for the future of Exxon. Like the hole in the O-zone they tried to deny for years, there was not enough evidence at one time in the past to prove climate change. Technology has come a long way and has proven both the O-zone crisis and global warming to be real. Read it and weep, guys. Even a community college student can show these skeptic-tologists to be wrong.

Sources:

Michaels, Patrick J., ed. Shattered Consensus: The True State of Global Warming. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2005.

Moore, Thomas Gale. Climate of Fear: Why we Shouldn’t Worry about Global Warming. Washington DC: Cato Insititute, 1998.

Cooper, Mary H. “Global Warming.” Congressional Quarterly. CQ Researcher. Folsom Lake College, EDC library. 29 Jan. 2007. <http//www.cqresearcher.com>

Plus, there are many websites that report scientists (I use the term loosely) who are being paid by Exxon. Enjoy your Techron, guys.

How to Bash a Neocon (Whenever You Want)

I was just wondering how easy it might be to make Ann Coulter look like an idiot. I, a college student, might not have a chance against someone who was named “one of the top 100 public intellectuals by federal judge Richard Posner in 2001” (fire that guy) as it mentions in her “About the Author,” but I’ve read a couple of her articles on her website (which is the only place she has a job now, I believe) so I knew what I was up against. Not surprisingly, it was fairly simple: she does it to herself. I only had to purchase her throwaway book from a yard sale for three bucks, titled “How to talk to a Liberal (If you Must)” published in 2004, and use common sense to see just how ignorant she really is.

All the inconsistencies, all the twists of the truth, all the sources that remain a mystery, the examples of what unnamed people are saying, just in her introduction are far too extensive to list on my humble little blog. I will, however, present here a few of her inane remarks:

Freedom of Speech: “There is probably no conservative student newspaper in the country that has not been trashed or burned by liberal” (2).

How dare liberals burn Dartmouth student newspapers in protest! My god! First amendment! All the conservative student press wanted to do is make light of date rape, racism, and poke fun at Native Americans! After all that hard work, I’m sure these righteous young minds are up for a get together, probably keeping themselves warm over a bonfire of Harry Potter books, like any good Christian.

On Torture: “Torturing the guy you know for a fact is withholding information actually works quite well” (7).

Of course! No one admits to a crime they haven’t really committed! We can be sure the people we torture are guilty! Look how many inmates have been put on death row with the solid evidence of a signed confession obtained after hours of interrogation! They weren’t even being physically harmed when they started talking! Let’s just never mind how many confessors have been exonerated through DNA evidence.

Page 8: “Al Gore couldn’t say ‘pass the salt’ without claiming to have invented salt.”

That Al Gore. I’m sure this is in reference to a quote of him saying, “I invented the internet.” Wait, where is that quote? I can’t seem to find it anywhere! Could it be that this is the actual quote, as I found on CNN.com? “During my service in the United States Congress, I took the initiative in creating the Internet.” This website makes an excellent point about why Al Gore wasn’t that far off.

Page 10: [Regarding her first rule for talking to a liberal] “Come to think of it, since our side does not accept Klansmen [Senator Bryd], murderers [Ted Kennedy], or rapists [William Jefferson Clinton], this rule may be simplified to: Don’t be defensive.”

That’s right! Because when the Democrats made it clear in 1964 that racism and discrimination were not part of the core values held by that party, a certain segregationist Mr. Strom Thurmond, then a Democrat (Dixiecrat, really), had no where to go but the party that would accept such a man: The Republicans.

As far as rape and murder, good thing justice was served. ­–Oh, what was that you said Voice of Reason? What do you mean not convicted? What do you mean not even charged? Are there any politicians that have been convicted or charged with sex crimes? Maybe these ones?

The ‘F’ Word: “On the bright side, you know you’ve arrived when liberals start calling you a fag. Curiously, these proponents of tolerance always choose ‘gay’ as their most searing epithet” (15).

Do I need to go here? I can’t even sarcastically address this one! Really, Google “Ann Coulter calls (Take a pick: Clinton, Gore, or Edwards) a fag” and you get all kinds of websites! Including YouTube, where you can hear her say the very word! What a nut! How many liberals did she name that use the word fag? Nought! Because she’s got monopoly on it!

The best part is, she thinks she can say “It was a joke” and everything is ok. We’ll forgive her without an apology because she was only poking fun. And now for a personal antidote just to prove a point: When I reached the ripe age of seven, I realized I could hurt my little sister’s feelings calling her names and get away with it by shouting, “Just kidding! I was only joking with you!” Fortunately, my parents are smarter than Coulter’s (who should have left her at the hospital in whatever year she says she was born-it changes all the time). They realized quickly my scheme and put a stop to it right away.

Ok, one more and then I’m done.

How to Beat up on a Republican: Page 11 and 12 the right-wingnut tells her minions never to compliment a Democrat because “compliments to Democrats are always returned with insults.” She then describes an epidode of “Larry King Live” from May 7, 2004. As evidence of Democrats returning insults to the compliments of conservatives, she uses the first statement of each senator featured on the show.

Senator John Warner (Republican of Virginia): “First, If I may say of my colleagues on the committee, and twenty-four senators out of twenty-five were present at that hearing, I think we comported ourselves individually and collectively as best I’ve seen it in the Senate….”

Senator Jon Kyl (Republican of Arizona): “I agree with Senator Warner that the senators comported themselves well for the most part….”

Senator Tom Harkin (Democrat of Iowa): “Well, [Rumsfeld should resign] for a couple of reasons.”

Sure sounds to me like Democrat beating up on Republicans that was just trying to give out kudos for the great job that was done! As soon as the Republican senators give out compliments, that Harkin belligerently tries to dispute them!

In reality, the second and third quotes are much further in the transcript than the first. Harkin is not replying to Kyl and Warner’s compliments of a job well-done. He is answering a question posed by the host of the show, Larry King.

King: “Senator Harkin, why do you think he should resign?”

Sen. Harking: “Well, for a couple of reasons”.

Now, correct me if I’m wrong, but isn’t the whole point of a talk show to feature two different opinions?

Her next example of Democrats beating up on Republicans is a transcript from “Meet the Press” that I found dated on May 9, 2004

A few days later, Republican senator Lindsey Graham used about half his allotted time on Meet the Press to make clear he had absolutely no criticisms of the Democrats: “I didn’t come here to beat on Senator Kerry or to defend any political position. This is not about Republican and Democratic politics….[Let’s] show the world that Republicans and Democrats may disagree on policy and the war in Iraq, but we have the ability to make sure those accountable are going to be held accountable….Republicans and Democrats need to come together to prove to the world that our system works.”

The Democrats on the panel returned the love by accusing President Bush of responsibility for Abu Ghraib prison abuse (Senator Carl Levin: “I think he helped to create the atmosphere,” saying the mission in Iraq would probably fail (General Wesley Clark: “I think there is a greater than 50/50 chance, let’s say 2:1 chance, of a catastrophic early end to this mission”).

I found the transcript on NBC.com. They ask that any use of their material be cited as NBCNews’ Meet the Press©2004. They are so nice. Random House (the shrew’s publisher) will probably take me away in the middle of the night for all the material I’m using against- I mean from- Coulter, even if I do cite it.

First of all, Levin does not say, “I think he helped to create the atmosphere” in response to Graham’s statement. Graham’s statement comes much later in the transcript. In fact, Levin is responding to the host, who had asked, “You believe the president then is ultimately responsible?” Levin answers, “I think he helped to create the atmosphere by the way in which he called the Geneva Convention discussion relative to Afghanistan a matter of legalism. It’s not legalism. It goes right to the heart of this matter.”

Not only does Coulter include incomplete quotes and position them in such a way as to mislead her faithful readers, but she leaves context out as well. Graham didn’t appear on Meet the Press to talk about uniting parties. The point of the show was to find out who was responsible for the torture that occurred at Abu Ghraib. Again, aren’t talk shows supposed to feature different points of view? Unless you are Fox News, the point of these debates is to show both sides of an issue.

So, after all 18 pages of the introductory chapter, I have one of the longest blogs I’ve ever written, and I even left a lot of her screw-ups out. You should really read the one about liberals “getting drunk and having unprotected public sex with Colin Farrell” (page 11, regarding her feelings toward public apologies). If you can find a free copy, pick it up and see for yourself. However, don’t spend any money on it because I can honestly say I want my three dollars back.

 

Now for the boring stuff:

Sources:

CNN Larry King Live. “Analysis of Donald Rumsfeld’s Congressional Testimony.” CNN.com © 2005 Cable News Network LP, LLLP. A Time Warner Company. All Rights Reserved.

Coulter, Ann. How to Talk to a Liberal (If You Must): the world according to Ann Coulter. New York: Crown Forum, 2004.

NBC News’ Meet the Press Copyright © 2004, National Broadcasting Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Text: The New Verb

Text messaging has become very popular, very fast. In fact, the word text is now used as a verb by nearly everyone in my generation, as in, “Text me later,” or, “I’ll text you when I’m out of class.”

I sat in my Political Science class a few weeks ago and watched a couple pass notes to eachother while the teacher was lecturing. That’s right folks, their parents were paying for their education and they were using the time to write love letters to eachother. I could see at their hips that they were carrying mighty nice motorolas that their parents in El Dorado Hills had bought for them (I know they are from El Dorado Hills because they shared this information at a prior date). The boy was busy pretending to be busy on his spiffy new MacBook (probably just checking his myspace). I thought to myself, “Well, why don’t they just use those cell phones to text eachother? That way they wouldn’t have to wait for the teacher to turn around before throwing their notes over their shoulders.”

Then it hit me. I came up with the best text message promo slogan this side of the Mississip’! Here it is folks:

Text messaging: It’s like passing notes in class!

Ok. So maybe I’m exaggerating over the whole Mississip’ thing, but I really like it and that is all that matters.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.